2018 Baker Center Grand Policy Challenge
The Howard Baker Grand Policy Challenge is a challenging, fun, educational research program that requires a semester-long commitment.
Winners will be chosen by a team of experts and will receive cash prizes to further their proposed policy solutions as follows: Grand prize = $3,000 and two runner-ups = $1,000 each.
To register for the 2018 Baker Center Grand Policy Challenge click the link here.
Started in 2013, the Challenge is a “real-world” experience that shows students how to engage in civic life and make an impact by using public policy research to solve real issues confronting society. The Challenge is open to all UT students.
The winners of the 2018 Grand Policy Challenge and their policy briefs can be found here.
Students may register as:
a team represented by a club or group that wants to address a particular issue
a team enrolled in a Spring semester credit course – your professor will discuss in class
an individual – you may wish to apply for special topics credit as this takes time and commitment, particularly when working on your own
STUDENTS MUST register online by Jan. 26, NOON
The HBGPC requires students to develop a:
5-9 page policy brief (Policy Challenge Brief Guide)
3-5 min. semi-final video (determines teams advancing to Final competition on 4/27/18)
5 min. PowerPoint presentation
Short blog post about their problem and team (optional)
Students will engage in research and analysis, stakeholder identification and engagement, project management, teamwork, critical thinking, creativity and innovation as they develop their knowledge of the public policy process, communication skills, presentation skills, interviewing and creating a policy brief, Powerpoint presentation, and video. Students will learn about current issues affecting their world and how they can impact society directly. The Baker Center will provide resources (examples, advice, etc.), a policy brief template and support throughout the semester.
The HBGPC is based on the University of Pennsylvania’s Fels Institute Policy Challenge and has evolved since 2013. The Challenge requires an individual or team to tackle a real issue which can be addressed with a public policy solution or something that informs public policy (educational website, a training program, a mobile app, etc.). We will offer some problems gathered from local and state agencies, but students can find their own too. Our previous winners developed policy solutions:
2016 – $3,000 – Born Drug-Free in TN – Lucas Stewart – Neonatal abstinence
2016 – $1,000 = Farm to UTK – Mary Waddill, Morgan Faulk, & Kristin Riggsbee, Nutrition graduate students – fresh produce available on campus
2016 – $1,000 = VOLCON – Mark Christian, Kaitlyn McNabney, Guinevere Shaw, & Michael Ashworth – graduate students – designed website for volunteers to sign up for Community Schools work.
2015 – $3,000 – Pay Now/Pay Later – Provide mental health screening of TN incarcerated juveniles.
2015 – $1,000 – Project Baggage – Remove plastic bags from the UT campus within 5 years.
2015 – $1,000 – Connect Forward – Link Tennessee Families First clients to jobs
HBGPC – Process
To make the field of participants in the Final Challenge on Friday, April 27, 2018 more manageable, students will compete in a semi-final by submitting their policy brief and a 3-5 minute video presenting their problem and solution. It will be due on April 9, 2018. The video should support the policy and will be judged on content, not the technical merit of the video itself.
Policy briefs should be direct and concise, about 5-9 pages, excluding appendix and references.
The brief must include:
Executive Summary–This section is for those who won’t likely read the entire brief. Therefore, it must interest the reader and provide a synopsis of the main parts and findings.
Introduction & Problem Statement– Introduction, background, current policies, solution
Policy Options–Alternative solutions working in other areas and your solution -justified
Action Plan– Timetable for implementation, stakeholders identified with roles, promotion & marketing plan, evaluation plan, future/continuous improvement process
Budget and Funding Sources/Needs—Resources needed for policy implementation and possible source
Conclusion—Concise summary of proposal
Appendix—Any supplemental information that is essential to the proposal
References—Sources used to develop proposal
All sources should be listed. The supporting arguments for a policy recommendation must communicate in a compelling manner — why it is the best! For example, students must thoughtfully consider not only the substance of a specific policy, but also the socio-political influences, costs, stakeholders (direct and indirect, for and against), institutional processes, and decision-making structures, which are involved in approving, initiating and implementing the recommended policy. It is very important to consult those supporting the issue, against the issue, impacted by the problem, and those in power to implement your solution. Your project may also be a tool, such as a website, educational program, software or app that further addresses or informs an existing problem.
Is there a clear problem definition and significant issue?
Is the solution doable and worth doing?
Is there a solid implementation plan?
Do they have a plan to measure success?
Have they engaged the issue’s stakeholders?
Was the team’s oral and written presentation persuasive and will they be effective?
Timeline and Deliverables 2018
Recommended Progress Timeline (turning in the draft materials before the semi-finals round on April 9 is NOT required):
Wed., January 24, Noon
Pizza & HBGPC – Reception/Q&A – TBD
Fri., January 26, Noon
Application Deadline Online
M-F – Jan. 29 – Feb. 2
1st Deliverable Due: DRAFT Problem Statement –During this week independent teams should Email their statement and discuss BY APPOINTMENT with firstname.lastname@example.org. Students enrolled in a course using the Challenge will meet with their professor as directed by his/her syllabus.
Mon. Feb. 12
2nd Deliverable Due—DRAFT Executive Summary (1-2 pgs.) Teams should schedule a meeting to discuss draft BY APPOINTMENT with email@example.com OR with your professor
3rd Deliverable Due: Anytime during the month, submit a Blog Post about your topic and team with team photo
Mon., March 5
4th Deliverable Due: DRAFT Policy Brief –Email and make APPOINTMENT with firstname.lastname@example.org OR with your professor
Spring Break – Enjoy!
Mon., April 9
Semi-Finals: Those wanting to compete in the HBGPC Final on Friday, April 27 must submit a 3-5 min. video and policy brief to class professor or Dr. Cahill for critique.
Thurs., April 12
Finalists moving on to Policy Challenge Finals announced
Tues., April 24
5th Deliverable Due: ALL Finalists will submit their final policy brief PDF to email@example.com (will be forwarded to judges)
Fri., April 27, 1:30 pm
Howard Baker Grand Policy Challenge Finals
6th Deliverable – Five (5) Minute PowerPoint Presentation & 8 minute Q & A with judges. Bring PPT on thumbdrive or email to firstname.lastname@example.org